Audit the live Zaps
We record owners, run frequency, dependencies, recent failures and business priority. Unused or duplicate automation is flagged before anything is rebuilt.
Move your Zaps to Make.com through a controlled rebuild, with mapped logic, tested data and a cutover plan that keeps live operations running.
Start migration
Migration Process
We provide a wide range of services to help you migrate from Zapier to Make.com
We inventory every live Zap, including triggers, actions, branches, data transformations, API calls, schedules, credentials and error handling. The goal is behaviour parity, not a visual copy, because Zapier and Make.com structure automation differently.
| Zapier element | Make.com destination | Migration check |
|---|---|---|
| Triggers and actions | Trigger and app modules | Event, field and authentication mapping |
| Paths and filters | Routers and filters | Every branch tested with known inputs |
| Data transformation | Mapping functions and tools | Output compared field by field |
| Webhooks and API calls | Webhooks and HTTP modules | Authentication, response and retry tests |
| Schedules and errors | Scheduling, retries and alerts | Failure handling and owner confirmed |
We record owners, run frequency, dependencies, recent failures and business priority. Unused or duplicate automation is flagged before anything is rebuilt.
We choose the right modules, connection model, naming rules, folders and error strategy. Each source step receives a documented destination mapping.
We rebuild complete outcomes rather than copying isolated steps. This keeps related branches, data rules and downstream systems together.
Known payloads prove the expected result, while missing fields, expired credentials, rate limits and API errors prove the recovery path.
The old and new versions run under a controlled plan. We compare results, switch production traffic and keep a rollback window until the new scenarios are accepted.
We prevent duplicate writes, missed schedules and silent branch failures with source IDs, test payloads, execution logs and a named owner for every acceptance check. Credentials are reconnected securely rather than copied as plain text.
Make.com is a better fit when your team values visual routing, data transformation and control over multi-step scenarios. Zapier remains strong for quick setup, broad app coverage and an interface accessible to business teams, so we confirm the operating model before recommending a move.
| Decision area | Zapier | Make.com |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | quick setup, broad app coverage and an interface accessible to business teams | visual routing, data transformation and control over multi-step scenarios |
| Build model | Zapier Zaps built from steps | Make.com scenarios built from modules |
| Operations | Current monitoring, credentials and incident process | Rebuilt monitoring, credentials and incident process |
| Migration approach | Inventory and baseline for current behaviour | Rebuild, test, parallel run and controlled cutover |
Scope depends on the number of active Zaps, branch complexity, custom code, API calls, data stores, credential owners and required cutover rehearsals. We quote after the audit, using the verified inventory and acceptance plan.
Our Make.com specialists can handle platform configuration after cutover, while the migration overview helps you compare other routes.
Expertise
Backed by industry-recognized certifications and performance metrics







500+
Clients
15000+
Automations
7+
Years of experience
Our process
We take you from manual struggle to automated joy in 4 easy steps
We start by understanding your business, your challenges, as well as the processes and systems you use.
We inventory your scenarios, workflows, custom fields, and data, then map every piece to its equivalent on the target platform in a step-by-step migration plan.
We rebuild your workflows and data on the new platform and run old and new side by side, so your team keeps working while we migrate and test in the background.
We verify parity between source and target, cut over once you approve, and hand over documentation so your team is confident on the new platform.
Testimonials
A direct import rarely reproduces the full behaviour. We map the business rule and rebuild it with Make.com modules, then test the output against the current automation.
Yes, when the systems and APIs allow a parallel run. We define how duplicate writes are prevented and when the old Zaps will be disabled.
Connections are authorised again in Make.com. Passwords, tokens and secrets are not copied into documents or plain text fields.
We review the inputs, outputs, authentication and failure behaviour, then rebuild the logic using the safest suitable Make.com step or a maintained service.
We compare expected and actual outputs, inspect execution logs and obtain acceptance from the process owner before cutover.
Cost follows workflow count, complexity, custom code, integrations, test coverage and the number of production cutover windows.
Let's find together where you can implement AI and automation securely, and built to last.